Sunday, January 31, 2016

A511.3.3.RB_PowerAndInfluence_LouBeldotti

POWER AND INFLUENCE
He-man!  He had the power.  His power came from a double-edged broad sword.  He hung out with the Masters of the Universe fighting the powers of evil.  Their nemesis was skeletor…a villain with a skull head and a maniacal laugh.   I guess that works if the world were a cartoon.  The world, although sometimes seeming cartoonish, doesn’t work that way.  Although we deal with characters, we must sadly face our issues without the broad sword.
            The learning objective in chapter 8 of Dr. Gary Yukl’s text are:
·         Understand the process by which power is acquired or lost in an organization.
·         Understand the consequences of power for leadership effectiveness.
·         Understand ways to use power effectively.
·         Understand the different types of influence tactics used in organizations.
·         Understand how the tactics are used to influence subordinates, peers and superiors.
·         Understand effective ways to use the tactics.
Dr. Yukl breaks it down into three categories:
1.       Power
2.      Authority
3.      Influence Processes
Dr. Yukl’s influence processes are:  Instrumental Compliance, Internalization and Personal Identification. (Yukl, 2013)
While doing some internet research, I found the following article which echoes much of Dr. Yukl’s text:
Power and Influence
What role does power and influence have on leadership styles? What impact does it have on follower/staff behavior and performance? This is a question that all leaders, whether they be organizational leaders, business leaders, team leaders or project leaders need to address. Power is the capacity of others to exert their will over others. It is the ability to make things happen, overcoming potential resistance in order to achieve desired results. The person, group or team seeks to influence thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors of another individual, group or team.
Power may be used positively or negatively. When used negatively it may well cause conflict. Used positively it can be used to overcome conflict and even avert it. 
Different sources of power have been identified and can be described based on power Sources (a) Positional Power and (b) Personal Power:
http://www.leadership-development-tips.com/images/Followers.jpgPositional Power Sources
  • Legitimate Power
  • Reward Power
  • Coercive Power
Personal Power Sources
  • Referent Power
  • Expert Power
  • Information Power
Legitimate Power
Legitimate Power is related to the position or status of the person in the organization. The person believes that they have the right to make demands on others and expect them to be compliant. Legitimate power gives the leader/manager power over their direct reports. The more senior a person is and/or the more people they may have in their team the more positional power the person perceives that they have. All managers have some degree of positional power.
Warnings:
  • People are influenced by the position and not by you
  • Your ability to influence through legitimate power is restricted by those situations in which people believe you have the right or power to influence their actions or behaviors
  • Do not rely on legitimate power to influence others. Doing so may result in you abusing your power. This will lead to poor working relationships (see motivational theory) and potential conflict.
I have worked with managers who have abused this power. The result has led to demotivated individuals or teams, conflict and loss of respect for the manager from team members. All leaders need to assess how they are using legitimate power. Develop other sources of power to increase your influencing skills and achieve results through your people.
Reward Power
Reward power is the ability to give rewards. Examples of these rewards are promotions, pay increases, working on special projects, training and developmental opportunities and compliments. Reward power is the result of positional power. and is limited to your position in the organization. You may not always have complete control over the rewards. However, due to your position you may be able to have some influence in the rewards. Look at what rewards you can use to influence other's behaviors and actions.
Coercive Power
Coercive Power is the opposite of Reward Power. It is the ability to use threats and punishments. Many managers and leaders abuse this source of power leading to greater problems. Extensive use of coercive power should be avoided. Leadership styles may tend to be very autocratic. Be careful that you are not exerting power over others inappropriately.
Referent Power
Referent power is the ability of others to identify with those who have desirable resources or personal traits. You may also hear of charismatic power. This comes from the personal characteristics of the person. For example: Their energy, endurance, empathy, toughness, humor, charm. People with this source of power can influence people. However, again be careful that you do not abuse it.
Expert Power
Expert power refers to the power that people have who have specialist knowledge, who are experts in their field or have knowledge or skills that are in short supply. People tend to listen more to those who demonstrate expertise. Expert power does not require positional power. Leaders and managers should also be aware of expert power where it exists in their teams. To ignore it is potentially abusing their positional power.
How can you use and develop expert power as a leader? Here are some ideas:
  • Use it to offer guidance and support to your team and to motivate them
  • Use it to gain respect for your position, skills and knowledge from your peers, those above you in the organization, from your team, from customers, suppliers and those with whom you interact
  • Develop expertise, both knowledge and skills, that are required for your position and future positions. Keep yourself informed of new developments in your area
  • Maintain your credibility by participating in discussions that you are well informed on. Beware of trying to give the impression that you are an expert in all areas. You are not. Use the appropriate expertise from your team and other departments or functions
  • Be open to discuss concerns that your team or others may have. By listening to their concerns you can use your expertise to allay them. Thus creating credibility and respect. This is a very important skill in leading change and managing resistance
  • Acknowledge the expertise that is in your team. You do not need to have more expertise than them in every area
(Leadership and Development, n.d.)
            In this assignment, I am asked to reflect on the power that I personally bring to my work place (if you are not employed, think about an organization of which you are part…such as your family or your church).
·         What are the sources of that power?
·         What is the nature of that power?
·         How is it used or not used?
·         How is that power related to your ability to lead or follow?
·         Finally, if it applies, have you experienced high quality LMX situations within your workplace which are dysfunctional in the sense that Othamn et al describe in the extra reading material for this module?
            When I was in the Army, I had legitimate power.  General military authority was given to me based on my rank.  Anyone with lesser rank than I had to do as I said.  This authority was bestowed by the U.S. Army.
            Unfortunately, this mantle of leadership was sometimes bestowed on people who could not lead their way out of a wet paper bag.
            However, the Army did provide leadership training in a well thought out format.  Enlisted Soldiers have a system known as the Noncommissioned Officer Educational System (NCOES) and Commissioned Officers have a system known as the Officer Educational System (OES). 
            General Military Authority is used judiciously.  As a senior Soldier, we don’t lord our authority like a tyrant. 
            To the best of my knowledge, I have not experienced high quality LMX situations within my workplace.



Refernces
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. (8th ed.).  Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice.

Leadership and Development (n.d.) Power and Influence. Retrieved on January 31, 2016 from http://www.leadership-development-tips.com/power-and-influence.html

Sunday, January 24, 2016

A511.2.3.FB_LouBeldotti - Supportive Behavior

SUPPORTIVE BEHAVIOR




Telly Savalas' tag line was: "Who loves you, Baby?" Just like Shrek and Donkey, their "supportive behavior and relationship" was always there but was generally inferred. They never directly indicated that they cared or supported the other but their behavior towards each other spoke volumes.

In this blog, I will lay out Dr. Gary Yukl's take on supportive leadership. However, before I do, I will impart my thoughts.

As a supportive leader, I have always been there for my subordinates. I have accepted each new person as part of the team. Part of my on-boarding process is to welcome them, introduce them to the team and counsel them on expectations and how to be successful. I would assign them a sponsor and mentor and coach them throughout their tenure. I would sponsor professional development at least twice per month and encourage them to not only seek career development courses but also college courses. My door was always open and they could come to me with personal or professional problems. In times of personal hardship, I would be an ear to bend and a shoulder to cry on. I would direct them to organizations that could help or even try to help myself. I would bring public praise in times of accomplishment and counsel in private when something went wrong. This is Army Leadership. The "Be, Know, Do" of leadership.

BE – this is all about your character as a leader and is foundational to your ability to lead. It gives you the courage to do what is right regardless of the circumstances or the consequences. As part of BE, you should be aware of your personal core values as well as your organization’s values. For the Army, their values are:

Loyalty
Duty
Respect
Selfless Service
Honor
Integrity
Personal Courage


KNOW – This is about the knowledge and skill sets you need to be competent as a leader and cover four areas:

Interpersonal skills
Conceptual skills
Technical skills
Tactical skills


Your mastery of the knowledge and skills required for your role are essential to the success of your organization.

DO – Leaders act. They bring together everything they are, everything they believe, and everything they know how to do to provide purpose, direction, and motivation. This involves the following three leader actions:

Influencing
Operating
Improving

(Allen, 2011)

In Dr. Gary Yukl's text, Leadership in Organizations (Yukl, 2013), Dr. Yukl defines supportive leader as a concern for the needs and feelings of other people also helping build and maintain effective interpersonal relations.  He states that it is more satisfying to work with someone who is friendly, cooperative and supportive than with someone who is cold and impersonal, or worse, hostile and uncooperative.  I completely agree with Dr. Yukl.  I know that in my past experiences, I was happier working for a boss who was more of a "people person" than a cold task master.

Dr. Yukl reminded me of Army Leadership in his text.  It was as if I was reading an Army Regulation, Field Manual or policy letter.  In chapter 3, pages 63-72, Dr. Yukl lays out guidelines for supporting, developing and providing praise and recognition for subordinates.  He echoes just about everything I ever learned about leadership as a Soldier in the U.S. Army.  I thought to myself that maybe Dr. Yukl had possibly served in the U.S. Army.  I did a little research and discovered that although Dr. Yukl had never in the military, he had been involved in several projects to help improve leadership in the US Army and Navy.

References

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. (8th ed.).  Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice.

Allen, BG. (March 7, 2011). Be-Know-Do, The Army's Leadership Model. [BGALLEN: coaching.consulting.ministry].  Retrieved on January 24, 2016 from http://bgallen.com/2011/03/07/be-know-do-%E2%80%93-the-army%E2%80%99s-leadership-model/


Friday, January 15, 2016






Leadership versus Management

The first leader to inspire me was my 9th grade guitar teacher. Mr. Larry Cole. He was cool…he was smooth…he was talented. He led by example and always took the extra time to make sure that I got it right. Not only did he teach me during the school day but he taught me after school hours. Even after 38 years, we still stay in touch. Larry Cole was a great inspiration to me. A man that I could look up to. A learned many things from Larry.

All leaders are managers but not all managers are leaders. Leaders influence people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation, while operating to accomplish the mission and improve the organization. Managers enforce the leader’s vision. I would say that managers are leaders in training. Leaders bestow their mantle upon managers and managers manage. In other words, managers are the go-between between workers and leaders.

In Gary Yukl’s text book, Leadership in Organizations, Mr. Yukl contends that leaders command Armies, direct corporate empires and shape nations. Frankly, I would agree with some reservations. I have personally seen Army leaders fall from grace, corporate empires crumble and nations turn against itself due to poor leaders. I would add to Mr. Yukl’s statement, “successful leaders…”

In Simon Sinek’s TED YouTube video, how great leaders inspire action (Sinek, 2010), Mr. Sinek states, “So, where do you start when you have a program that's about integrating lives with passions? Well, you start with "why."”. He goes onto explain, “About three and a half years ago I made a discovery. And this discovery profoundly changed my view on how I thought the world worked, and it even profoundly changed the way in which I operate in it. As it turns out, there's a pattern. As it turns out, all the great and inspiring leaders and organizations in the world -- whether it's Apple or Martin Luther King or the Wright brothers -- they all think, act and communicate the exact same way. And it's the complete opposite to everyone else. All I did was codify it, and it's probably the world's simplest idea. I call it the golden circle. Why? How? What?” This is a fantastic revelation! The key is not “what” or “how” but it is actually “why”. Why a leader leads, why a company is successful, why others follow.




References